How Paul’s personal problem became Corner Stone of Christianity!

How Paul’s personal problem became Corner Stone of Christianity!

“when the commandment came, sin sprang to life, and I died.  And the commandment which was meant to bring life, in my case brought death.”  – Paul

 

Question Mark

 

Introduction

 

God revealed Laws of the Old Testament (OT) so that its followers could live a successful life in every respect! Over centuries, OT prophets and their followers held high esteem about the benefits of the Laws.

However, later, after the ascension of Jesus (peace be upon him), Paul promulgated entirely different concepts about Law. It now had little or no positive providence but a lot of negative implications.

Nevertheless, Paul by purporting so breached a lot of divinely revealed verses of the OT. The sad part does not end here – the violations (of OT Laws and verses) became corner stone of Christianity!

Thus, it is our intent to bring to light the breaches and request sincere Christians to reconsider whom and what they are following.

Pauline Theology: Laws engender Sins

 

If one visits the various “epistles” which Paul has written, he will observe that Paul had little or no consideration for the benefits of the Laws:

“Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.” (Gal 3:21-22, King James Version, e-Sword)

 

In fact Paul unabashedly claims that sins are nourished because of the God-breathed-Laws so much so that without Laws sins are a dead thing (!):

“Death gets its power to hurt from sin, and sin gets its power from the Law. But thanks be to God who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ!” (1 Corinthians 15: 56-57)

“For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect: Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.” (Rom 4:14-15. King James Version, e-Sword)

If the Law not said, “Do not desire what belongs to someone else,” I would not have known such a desire. But by means of that commandment sin found its chance to stir up all kinds of selfish desires in me. Apart from law, sin is a dead thing.” (Romans 7:7-8) 

Furthermore, Paul goes out of the way to ironically and absurdly claim that the only reason why God revealed Laws so that “sins would increase” (!):

Law was introduced in order to increase wrongdoing; but where sin increased, God’s grace increased much more.” (Romans 5:20)

 

It is not hard to realize that Paul considered divine Laws to be the very cause of sins amongst humanity. In fact he attributes the functions of Satan upon God’s Laws by (i) claiming that sinful desires are incited by God’s divine Laws (ii) Humans are exposed to the knowledge and temptations of sins but because of Laws (otherwise humans would never have known sins). Consider the following Pauline verses:

 “For when we lived according to our human nature, the sinful desires stirred up by the Law were at work in our bodies, and all we did ended in death.” (Romans 7:5)

“Shall we say, then, that the Law itself is sinful? Of course not! But it was the Law that made me know what sin is. If the Law had not said, “Do not desire what belongs to someone else,” I would not have known such a desire.” (Romans 7:7)

 

Psalmist: OT Laws give success and salvation!

 

However, contrary to Paul’s utter low opinion and incrimination of the OT Laws; OT prophets reasoned that humans can keep away from sins only by following the Laws:

How can a young man keep his life pure? By obeying your commands. With all my heart I try to serve you; keep me from disobeying your commandments. I keep your law in my heart, so that I will not sin against youI will repeat aloud all the Laws you have given. I delight in following your commands more than in having great wealth. I study your instructions; I examine your teachings. I take pleasure in your Laws; your commands I will not forget.” (Psalms 119:9-16)

 

Notice the rationales of the Psalmist. For him, human can keep their life sin-free only by obeying and practicing the Laws. This is in stark contradiction to the Pauline teaching wherein Paul taught that (A.) sinful desires are stirred up by Laws and (B.) humans knew sins but because of the God-Breathed-Laws!?

Furthermore, why would the Psalmist find “delight” in obeying the Laws if it were stirring up sins in him? Was he morally less or was Paul more God fearing (than the Psalmist)? Did not the Psalmist know that Laws stir up sinful desires and therefore, he should not find “delight” in obeying the Laws? Or, was Paul misunderstanding the attributes of Laws?

In fact the Psalmist wanted to save the Laws in his heart – the same place where sins were stirred in Paul:

Your teachings are wonderful; I obey them with all my heart. The explanation of your teachings gives light and brings wisdom to the ignorant. In my desire for your commands I pant with open mouth…Save me from those who oppress me, so that I may obey your commands. Bless me with your presence and teach me your laws. My tears pour down like a river, because people do not obey your law.” (Psalms 119:129-136)

 

Notice the longing which the Psalmist has for the Laws. He is panting with open mouth and crying to follow the Laws. If Laws were revealed to “increase wrongdoing” then why was this Psalmist panting and crying to follow such Laws? Moreover, why does he want to obey them with all his heart? Who is compelling him to follow that which stir up “evil desires” and where revealed only to “increase wrong doings”?

The answer to all such queries are simple, either of the one – Psalmist or Paul misunderstood the purpose and qualities of the Laws. And in such a situation it is better to bank on the Psalmist who was God’s personally chosen messenger! Moreover, his views are multiply attested by other God’s prophets like Ezekiel, Nehemiah etc. Whereas, on the other hand, we have contemporaries of Paul contravening him!

In fact a closer look at Paul’s reasoning clarify that he had personal problems with the OT Laws and not that Laws were “sin inciting” per se as he claimed:

I myself was once alive apart from the Law; but when the commandment came, sin sprang to life, and I died.  And the commandment which was meant to bring life, in my case brought death”. (Romans 7:9-10)

 

We saw the providential capacities of the Laws with OT prophets – it was life and salvation giving to them (c.f. Ezekiel 20:11, 33:14-15), however, in Paul’s personal case, “…in my case…”  Laws were working backwards.

Conclusion

 

With the foregoing factual qualification, is it justified to reject and sneer at God’s divinely revealed Laws, multiply attested by numerous OT prophets; for the personal problems of an individual mortal (Paul)?

Before discarding the Laws as a whole, sincere Christians need to rethink:

There are God’s divine Laws which were all providential to sincere and purportedly strictest monotheists and they testified towards it so much so that they wanted to follow it with panting mouth and tears in their eyes.

And all of a sudden we have a mortal (Paul) who declares that Laws worked otherwise in his personal case while his contemporaries who were no less than him, expressed their fealty for the OT Laws and even disputed with Paul over the same!

Yet millions of Christians have no qualms in rejecting what was revealed by God to be followed. Sadly, it has become a corner stone of their theology.

Notes:

  • All biblical texts, unless otherwise mentioned, are taken from Holy Bible, Good News Edition, Today’s English Version.
  • Emphasize wherever not matching with the original, is ours.
Advertisements
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • DAWAH REFUTED  On March 10, 2012 at 11:01 am

    MAN CAN LIVE SIN FREE BY OBEYING THE LAW ??

    Have u really read David’s psalm carefully? I don’t have to present them all here, for SO MANY VERSES CLEARLY TELLS DAVID’S HAD COMMITTED VIOLATIONS AGAINTS THE LAW

    I give you just one of them Psalm 51:4 Against you, and you only, have I sinned,
    and done that which is evil in your sight; that you may be proved right when you speak, and justified when you judge.

    If David had been as you assume him to be then David wouldn’t have sinned ! but unfortunately the reality is the opposite by this simple truth one of your assumptions is easily debunked.

    Now specifically for Psalm 119 do you really read it ?because after verse 9, then verse 10 says, KEEP ME from disobeying your commandments.

    And then verse 29, KEEP ME from deceitful ways; BE GRACIOUS to me through your law.

    Verse 36, TURN MY HEART TOWARD YOUR STATUTES and not toward selfish gain

    Verse 40, How I long for your precepts! PRESERVE my life in YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS

    Those all verses tell you , It wasn’t David ability that made him able to do God’s Law and be justified but rather God’s grace

    Paul’s problem was not on loving the Law , PAUL’S PROBLEM WAS ON MEN MISUSING THE LAW TO JUSTIFY ONESELF!.

    Simple example: God commands men to be good not in order that men can prove themselves to be good before God but instead in order for men to rely upon God’s grace&mercy in fulfilling those command.

    SO GOD HAS GIVEN THE IDEAL WAY (THE LAW) YET ALSO GIVEN THE WAY TO ACHIEVE IT WHICH IS THROUGH GRACE IN CHRIST,

    ANY ATTEMPTS TO MAKE YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS WITHOUT GOD’S GRACE IS ARROGANCE BEFORE GOD… my friend! AND THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT PAUL HAS OBJECTED.

    my question for you :Do you consider yourself pure& sinless after all of your years in keeping Allah’s Law then?

    • qmarkmark  On March 18, 2012 at 11:36 pm

      Thanks for your notes brother “Dawah Refuted”!

      After reading your comments we think you invent and assume arguments for us- which we have not set forth, they you go on to address it to claim we have been “debunked” – amazing 😀 However, we wont mind discussing issues with you.

      You CLAIMED FOR US, “Have u really read David’s psalm carefully? I don’t have to present them all here, for SO MANY VERSES CLEARLY TELLS DAVID’S HAD COMMITTED VIOLATIONS AGAINTS THE LAW

      I give you just one of them Psalm 51:4 Against you, and you only, have I sinned,
      and done that which is evil in your sight; that you may be proved right when you speak, and justified when you judge.

      If David had been as you assume him to be then David wouldn’t have sinned ! but unfortunately the reality is the opposite by this simple truth one of your assumptions is easily debunked.”

      We never claimed that BIBLICAL David was sinless. We know that the Bible has incriminated even Prophets of the like of David (pbuh) with some of the most ghastily sins!

      You wrote the following, “SO GOD HAS GIVEN THE IDEAL WAY (THE LAW) YET ALSO GIVEN THE WAY TO ACHIEVE IT WHICH IS THROUGH GRACE IN CHRIST,

      ANY ATTEMPTS TO MAKE YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS WITHOUT GOD’S GRACE IS ARROGANCE BEFORE GOD… my friend! AND THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT PAUL HAS OBJECTED.”

      We are very sorry but you are putting words in the OT texts. We provided ample verses from OT wherein it says that man can keep their lives righteous not by grace through Christ (pbuh) but by following the OT laws!! Do you want us to cite you the OT verse(s) once again?

      You asked about myself. I do not think that I am pure and sinlesss. I do sin, however, just like Psalmist and other OT personalities, I seek refuge in Allah(SWT) once sinned. I return to Him directly for forgiveness without any body’s “blood” – just like OT personalities. I try to keep myself pure and sinless just as OT personalities but whenever I fail and sin – I return to Allah (SWT) for mercy and forgiveness of my sins 😉

      sincerely,
      Ibn Salim Khan

      • DAWAH REFUTED  On March 19, 2012 at 11:27 am

        You said : We never claimed that BIBLICAL David was sinless. We know that the Bible has incriminated even Prophets of the like of David (pbuh) with some of the most ghastily sins!

        FUNNY THAT YOU’RE JUST CONTRADICTING YOURSELF AGAIN because

        You’ve also said:
        We are very sorry but you are putting words in the OT texts. We provided ample verses from OT wherein it says that MAN CAN KEEP THEIR LIVES RIGHTEOUS NOT BY GRACE through Christ (pbuh) but by following the OT laws!! Do you want us to cite you the OT verse(s) once again?
        …………………………………………
        Please explain your contradicting logic on MAN CAN KEEP THEIR LIVES RIGHTEOUS NOT BY GRACE BUT BY KEEPING THE LAW when you yourself ADMIT EMPIRICALLY NO ONE CAN BE RIGHTEOUS(SINLESS). Your statement is just as same as saying: Man can keep themselves from violating the law although will violate it anyway OR let me put it in two simple analogies:
        It’s just the same as saying
        -You are fully able in not to eat your own children yet you will eat them anyway.
        – You can perform marathon perfectly to the finish without getting disqualified while in the same time also proclaiming you can’t get to finish and will be disqualified eventually.

        Sorry I don’t know from what planet you’re coming from but here in planet earth it’s called CONTRADICTION.

        Please make up your mind to choose either YOU’RE ABLE OR NOT ABLE TO BE RIGHTEOUS BY KEEPING THE LAW !

        The very Psalm 119 that you quoted even admit the concept of dependency upon God’s Grace, or should I cite it again for you ?
        Genuine Redemption will only be brought by Messiah(Christ) and this is original Jewish OT Concept (http://www.chiefrabbi.co.za/2011/08/did-you-long-for-the-redemption/), all of repentance and good deeds in OT will be useless if they are not being validated by hope upon Messiah’s Redemption.

        Now, because Christian and Jews believe in Al-Masih as the bringer of redemption since you’ve said you believe in Al-Masih why don’t you put your trust in Him to save you from your sin then?

        Blood of Christ has been ordained by God to be our Point of validating our request for mercy (Romans 5:2 ,Heb 10:19), so why do you object to what God has ordained then? Can you yourself argue upon why allah had ordained Kaabah as Point of validating your prayer when allah himself supposedly doesn’t not dwell in it ? Does your prayer is valid when it’s NOT directed toward the Kaabah ?

        Or why in saying syahada you have to testify Muhamad as the Rasool when you can also testify Isa or Noah, Ibrahim etc as Rasool ?

        Why questioning on what God had ordained on Christian and not questioning allah’s ordination on your own religion ?
        Some consistency please…

  • Civitate_dei  On January 28, 2013 at 7:58 pm

    paul is not saying that the law causes sin but that it made him conscious of sin. Paul’s point is that no external system like the law can address sin as no matter how perfectly you try to follow the law you will fail. Instead paul is saying through the indwelling holy spirit there is a new law written on the hearts of believers which causes internal change something the law failed to do. Paul does not have a low opinion of the law. In galatians paul calls the law a pedagouge until we came to full knowledge in christ. Pease read James Dunn’s commentary on romans and galatian.

Trackbacks

  • […] young man observed all the Laws and yet it never engendered any sinful, covetous desires in him; it was only in the case of Paul that the Laws were having a different effect than desired. In fact as we would soon observe Jesus (peace be upon him) “loved” the rich man for following […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: